Building Your Vision 2020 Part 4 – with John Eldert and Howard Teibel
Academic planning often adopts the business approach to strategic planning. The results are predictable: clear, measurable outcomes; tight, pithy vision statement; focused strategy targeting a clear and “directable” organizational culture. But these assumptions don’t fit the higher education planning environment, with many parallel lines of activity, complex vision, and an environment that is often far more self-directed. This week on the show, we bring you part four of our conversation with John Eldert, Vice President of Administration at Berklee College of Music as he joins Howard Teibel to discuss their work on adapting the business approach to strategic planning for higher education.
Listen now…
Building Your Vision 2020 Part 3 – with John Eldert and Howard Teibel
Academic planning often adopts the business approach to strategic planning. The results are predictable: clear, measurable outcomes; tight, pithy vision statement; focused strategy targeting a clear and “directable” organizational culture. But these assumptions don’t fit the higher education planning environment, with many parallel lines of activity, complex vision, and an environment that is often far more self-directed. This week on the show, we bring you part three of our conversation with John Eldert, Vice President of Administration at Berklee College of Music as he joins Howard Teibel to discuss their work on adapting the business approach to strategic planning for higher education.
Listen now…
Building Your Vision 2020 Part 2 – with John Eldert and Howard Teibel
Academic planning often adopts the business approach to strategic planning. The results are predictable: clear, measurable outcomes; tight, pithy vision statement; focused strategy targeting a clear and “directable” organizational culture. But these assumptions don’t fit the higher education planning environment, with many parallel lines of activity, complex vision, and an environment that is often far more self-directed. This week on the show, we bring you part two of our conversation with John Eldert, Vice President of Administration at Berklee College of Music as he joins Howard Teibel to discuss their work on adapting the business approach to strategic planning for higher education.
Listen now…
Building Your Vision 2020 Part 1 – with John Eldert and Howard Teibel
Academic planning often adopts the business approach to strategic planning. The results are predictable: clear, measurable outcomes; tight, pithy vision statement; focused strategy targeting a clear and “directable” organizational culture. But these assumptions don’t fit the higher education planning environment, with many parallel lines of activity, complex vision, and an environment that is often far more self-directed. This week on the show, we bring you part one of our conversation with John Eldert, Vice President of Administration at Berklee College of Music as he joins Howard Teibel to discuss their work on adapting the business approach to strategic planning for higher education.
Listen now…
Canary in the Coal Mine: When your teams aren’t functioning
This week, we sat down to record an episode of Navigating Change which addresses a topic that has become critically important in the work that I do with my clients. Across the higher education space, teams have been tasked to work differently, to face up to new challenges and obstacles, and to deliver results under conditions they have never encountered before. And while the obvious challenges that come with working in complex teams are plenty, those that can hurt the team the most tend to be hiding right under the surface. To sum it up:
As a manager, you are probably not aware of what is going wrong on your team.
Your first task as a manager or department leader is to deliver results. As such, we have established a cultural bias against sharing bad news, anything that doesn’t directly relate to delivering those results. When a staff member levels a concern of this nature, they risk being labeled a complainer, and so the routine continues. The result? A self-perpetuating culture of ignorance to the more insidious issues that may be occuring on your teams.
A leader needs to be willing to recognize that people will not be willing to share information that will potentially make them look bad unless they are confident that it won’t be pinned on them. In an environment of fear and blame, hiding the bad news trumps candor every time.
There is good news: you can change it.
First, understand that a mature, high-performing team does not have to agree 100% of the time. In fact, the best, most productive teams may not even have team members that like one another. But what you will see in every case of teams working well together across functions and projects is an environment of respect. As a leader, your job is to implement this key rule for interpersonal relationships: You may not like your colleagues, but respect them for the work they do.
Second, be a role model for open communication. Your teams will build their cultural habits based on cues they receive from you. If you are able to muster the strength to deliver news — the good and the bad — to your teams regularly, quickly, and succinctly, you will begin to see the same sort of respect for you.
Finally, take every mistake and use it as a visible opportunity for continuous improvement. Show that bad news does not equate to blame, but is a platform for conversation, learning, and new directions.
There is certainly more to be said here. I invite you to subscribe to Navigating Change (iTunes) and listen to the entire episode. Then, share your comments below and bring the discussion online.
The Economic Crisis: Danger or Opportunity?
Is the economic crisis a threat or hidden opportunity? It depends. For those who see it as a threat, they will maintain the status quo, keep their heads down and hope for the best. For those who see this crisis as an opportunity, an entirely different set of behaviors come out – a renewed sense of energy and willingness to demonstrate their value to the organization.
Which set of behaviors increase the likelihood of landing in a good or better place? It reminds me of the story where a man is praying to God in hopes of winning the lottery. After months of not having his prayers answered, God finally reaches down and says to the man “I have heard your prayers but if you could do me a favor…buy a ticket.” To get something better in life, you’ve got to get in the game.
What are some strategies that can help shift ones point of view to recognizing opportunities in a crisis or difficult situation? Here are five:
- Attitude Adjustment – Of all the strategies that can help shift one’s focus, attitude is the most important. Attitude drives behavior. As Dr. Alan Zimmerman talks about in his book Pivot: How One Turn in Attitude Can Lead to Success, “No one gave you a good attitude and no one can give you a bad attitude. It’s a choice.” This is a powerful statement and for many a useful wake-up call. Recently Dr. Zimmerman was interviewed on CBS’s Early Show and he was asked how we can maintain a positive attitude in the face of many challenges people face today. His response was “Failure is not the falling down but the staying down”. When people have setbacks, he suggests that they avoid the “Why” question. Why did this happen to me? Instead, focus on how you can learn from the failure. Simple, yet useful advice.
- Network – Whether one is gainfully employed or looking for work, networking is a key strategy to stay connected with new opportunities. Many of us find the prospect of networking to be outside of our comfort zone, but networking can bring huge dividends in learning about how one’s organization is changing or about job opportunities that may be perfect for one’s skills. Most jobs are filled through someone knowing a person who is right for the role. With all of the hiring freezes, vacancies or even layoffs, now is the time to stand out and show your interest in making a greater contribution. Management is looking for the best people right now, and they have much to choose from. Improve your position by building relationships through networking.
- Take Risks – Networking is a form of risk-taking, i.e. getting out of your comfort zone. Practicing stepping outside of one’s comfort zone is an important skill to develop, especially in times of perceived crisis. While others may be retreating to cautious behavior, those who take calculated risks can reap huge rewards. Opportunities are waiting.
- Professional Development – This may be the best time to develop new skills. If one’s organization offers professional or technical classes, jump in. There are multiple benefits to this. Firstly, new skills put one in a position to take on new responsibilities; secondly, it’s a networking opportunity. Most importantly, focusing on developing new skills increases one’s confidence and focuses one’s energy on positive action, versus the default reaction to how bad things are.
- Update One’s Resume or CV – Updating a resume can be a great way to increase one’s personal confidence. Most of us wait until we need a resume for a job application versus using the process of updating a resume to survey one’s skills. When we see our accomplishments on paper, it builds confidence to pursue other challenges or take on greater responsibility. Even if you’re content with your current role, having a resume handy can be very useful if a new opportunity arises. This is a competitive job market and many others are prepared to jump on an opportunity that may be perfect for you.
In times of crisis, we can dig our heels in, close our eyes and wait for the anticipated changes around us to happen. This is one option. We can also choose to get in the game by facing the challenge and asking “How can I help myself be in the best position when the dust settles?” Reminding each other we have this choice is the best way to help ourselves and others through this economic crisis.
There are hidden opportunities in a crisis. The question is: Will we allow ourselves to get involved, take a chance and trust that we will benefit from our decision to be proactive?
Many thanks to Denis Walsh for his observations and feedback.
[KFAFVNE4VPMG]
The Key To Getting Through This Economic Crisis
The economic crisis has jump-started a long-standing conversation among senior leaders in Higher Education. How can we best deliver services to our core stakeholders while finding ways to positively impact our financial condition? Since the economy tumbled in September 2008, actions taken by universities run the spectrum of “wait and see” to rethinking how to deliver services and programs, all while keeping the academic and administrative trains running. Like its corporate partners, colleges and universities are now publicly embracing the “bottom-line” as the core enabler of its mission.
For institutions that have embarked on broad organizational change, one thing’s for sure. Staff and faculty are anxious. While the most prevalent anxiety spoken is “Will I still have a job on the other side of this crisis?”, it’s not always about losing one’s job. The underlying fear is uncertainty.
It’s not so much that we’re afraid of change or so in love with the old ways, but it’s that place in between… It’s like being between trapezes. It’s Linus when his blanket is in the dryer. There’s nothing to hold on to.
Marilyn Feguson
Author and Public Speaker
In this period of change, institution leaders have two primary concerns: What if our planned restructuring to address the financial crisis evoke a sufficient negative reaction that cause it to fail? Even worse, what if the changes put in place are not enough?
On the other hand, if you ask staff doing the work what they fear, it’s the uncertainty of how they’re jobs may change or worse, go away. The power of uncertainty can have great control over our lives.
The Power Of Uncertainty
Take this example from a study conducted at Emory University:
A team at Emory University examined what happened when people waited for an impending electric shock. Some people dreaded the shock so deeply that they chose to receive a more powerful shock earlier rather than waiting for a lesser shock to arrive at a later, random time.
David Eagleman
NY times Op-Ed, December 3, 2009
Why would someone choose this counter-intuitive behavior? Simple. It’s more stressful to wait for something negative to happen than get it over with now. Knowing what’s coming has tremendous influence over our ability to focus. When changes like possible layoffs or organizational restructuring are anticipated, people’s anxiety levels are raised and strong emotions are evoked – from anger and fear for some to enthusiasm and excitement for the lucky few. The majority react to anticipated change assuming it will be bad for them. This, in itself is an irrational reaction.
Shifting One’s Focus
If we’re serious about transforming Higher Education, we need leaders to make tough decisions that position our institutions in a fiscally sound direction. These changes will not come all at once and require thoughtful analysis before implementing. There is no getting around that in this period of analysis, anxiety will be heightened because not all the answers will be clear. Institutional leaders need to help their most important assets, people, get through this period of accelerating change.
But it’s ultimately up to the individual to decide whether the coming changes are something to avoid or an opportunity to take advantage of.
Those who maintain a positive attitude through these challenging times are not free of fear or anxiety; they just choose to put their energy elsewhere. How can I improve my value or get more involved? What opportunities may come out of these changes that I can take advantage of? Are there things I can be learning that will help me get through this better? These questions are at the heart of shifting one’s point of view from “Why is this happening to me?” to “How can I best get through this?”
The key to getting through this economic crisis is to build a business culture that helps people learn to make positive choices in the face of uncertainty. It’s a partnership between management needing to focus on the big picture and the individual choosing to be part of the solution. This is true change management, transforming fear that breeds inaction to optimism that promotes opportunity and personal growth.
“Getting through this…” is not enough
I was honored to be interviewed by Jim Castagnera for this month’s Today’s Campus magazine, for a feature on what I’ve been calling the new normal. I invite you to read it here, as Jim ably covers issues many of us in the field have been discussing for years: the importance of intelligent business planning, the trouble of increasingly complex systems, and the danger inherent in a mentality many institutions share right now, “we just have to get through this… ”
These are challenging times. What comes next will be largely what we make of it by making good choices and long-term improvements in campus business operations. Jim has pulled together some terrific resources for this piece and I’m thrilled to be counted among them.
And make sure to bookmark Today’s Campus — it’s a terrific online publication that covers issues critical to our field.
Stop Doing and Start Helping!
There is nothing more arrogant than walking into an organization, assessing a people or process issue and believing you can single-handedly create a permanent solution.
The failure in most organizational projects is the presumption made about the giver and receiver relationship, the giver being those helping with the change and the receiver, those inheriting the change. The three most important presumptions are:
- The receiver is asking for the specific advice given
- The receiver is open to the advice, diagnosis or solution offered
- The giver understands enough of the problem to give this advice
These may seem like fair presumptions but more often than not, advice is given on incomplete information and both sides do not have a shared view of the problem. The problem doesn’t get fixed, the recipient doesn’t own the solution and the blame game for a less than satisfactory solution takes center stage. Sound familiar?
The Missing Piece
The first thing to recognize is the difference between advice and help.
When I consult with a surgeon, I’m looking for advice, a diagnosis and for that person to take care of the problem. Accountants, lawyers, doctors, architects – these roles are structured around evaluating a situation, applying expertise and doing the work. The person is the means to the solution.
Building a high-performing workforce is different. True success comes down to behavior change. Positive attitude, teamwork, trust, practice – these skills are the cornerstones of an effective workforce. You can’t talk someone into having a good attitude, exhibiting teamwork or being willing to make mistakes as a way to develop skills – they must want it themselves and be willing to do what it takes to get there.
But it’s so much easier to just give advice and then walk away, you say.
Projects involving people that end up being perceived as unsuccessful stem from an overemphasis of trying to solve their “problem” versus looking for ways to help them help themselves. At the heart of making positive change stick is asking this question:
“If diagnosing and advising only perpetuates a dependency and lack of self-reliance, how can you help the group take greater responsibility for their problems and solutions?” Focus on ways to get the groups to practice and immerse themselves in the behaviors that will build their confidence to do the work on their own. Stop doing it for them.
Yes, being an expert is useful but don’t confuse expertise with being helpful. Expertise doesn’t changes behavior. To get people acclimated to a new way of doing something, you must ask deeper questions about how they learn, retain information and are able to repeat this behavior on their own. Whether you’re the sponsor, manager, consultant or colleague, step back and find ways to allow individuals and groups to do for themselves, versus being so quick to solve their problem. Only then will they be able to run with the ball in a self-reliant way.
A great book that deconstructs the “helping relationship” is Edgar Schein’s book “Process Consultation Revisited – Building the Helping Relationship”. This book single-handedly helped me reshape how to think about consulting and make sure the responsibility for change lies with those needing to live with the change.
The Burning Platform For Change
Every once in a while management wakes up saying “let’s get disciplined”. This is one of those times. In a strong economy, there’s no compelling reason to embrace the idea of “doing more with less”. The irony is if we were more disciplined in good economic times, downturns like we’re experiencing right now would not be as difficult. But that’s water under the bridge and human nature – a topic for a different time.
The burning platform of “doing more will less” has spread to every industry, from corporate to non-profit, and educational institutions. The challenge is not “How do we get through this?” (which we will) but how can we build organizational structures and practices that retain the disciplines we’re putting in place right now? It’s easy to justify building stronger foundations when a tornado sweeps through.
Sustainability is a reminder to focus on the long term, not just the next financial cycle. It is necessary to start by tightening our belts, reducing budgets or institutionalizing temporary hiring freezes. But if we don’t learn how to retain that discipline when the economy stabilizes or improves, we’ve learned very little – except to run from a tornado when it strikes.
A great book that takes this long-term horizon on sustainability in Higher Education is Boldly Sustainable, by Peter Bardaglio and Andrea Putman. I highly recommend this book, both in the context of environmental sustainability but more importantly, how Higher Education needs to reorganize business structures and practices to produce greater coordination across academic and administrative functions. This is critical for sustainability in the broadest sense of the word.
